What can we safely say?
CIIS · Collaborative Impact Intelligence System
Know what your evidence lets you say.
CIIS helps organisations turn programme evidence into clear, evidence-backed reporting statements — with limits, gaps, and next actions kept visible.
Evidence surfaces. People decide. Limits stay visible.
Evidence
Attendance log
Program A · verified
Survey response
Q2 intake · 142 responses
Evaluation note
Facilitator log
Case note
Practitioner record
Funder metric
Acquittal template
Statement check
Evidence reviewed · limits visible
- Ready to sharecontinues
- Cautiouscontinues with limit
- Internal onlyheld back
- Not yet readyheld back
Report
Evidence-backed statement
Reporting limit
Source trail attached
The problem
Impact reporting breaks when evidence and claims drift apart.
Organisations collect attendance data, survey results, case notes, outcomes data, evaluations, spreadsheets, and funder templates. When reporting time arrives, one question remains: what can we safely say?
CIIS is built for that moment.
Which statements are supported?
Which statements are too strong?
What evidence is missing?
What needs fixing before this reaches a board, funder, or council?
What CIIS does
CIIS checks the statement before it reaches the report.
Bring evidence together
Capture programme evidence with source, context, and review status attached.
Review what the evidence supports
Check whether evidence is relevant, complete, and strong enough for the statement being made.
See what can be said
Separate statements into ready to share, cautious, internal only, and not yet ready.
Keep limits visible
When evidence is weak, incomplete, or mismatched, CIIS shows the limit instead of hiding it.
Prepare safer reports
Reports carry the evidence trail and the limits behind each statement.
Not a dashboard. Not an AI writer.
Not another dashboard. Not another AI writer.
Dashboard
Shows activity, outputs, and metrics — and leaves your team to decide what those numbers allow you to claim.
AI report writer
Drafts fluent language quickly — and can make weak evidence sound stronger than it is.
CIIS
Checks what the evidence allows before a statement reaches a formal report.
CIIS is designed to narrow the statement when the evidence is unclear.
How it works
From evidence to reporting limits.
A governed path — each statement is checked against its evidence before it can move toward a report.
- 01
Evidence enters the system
Programme evidence is captured with its source, context, and review status attached.
- 02
Evidence is reviewed against the statement
CIIS checks whether the evidence is relevant, complete, and strong enough for what is being claimed.
- 03
CIIS shows what can be said
Each statement is sorted into ready to share, cautious, internal only, or not yet ready.
- 04
Cautious and not-ready statements stay visible
Limits and gaps are surfaced instead of hidden, so nothing is quietly overstated.
- 05
Reports include only what the evidence supports
Report preparation carries supported statements and their limits forward.
- 06
The source trail stays attached
Every statement keeps its link back to the evidence behind it.
Trust & limits
When the evidence is unclear, CIIS does not dress it up.
CIIS is designed to be cautious. If evidence is incomplete, weak, mismatched, or not yet reviewed, the system narrows what can be said. That gives teams a clearer path: improve the evidence, soften the statement, or keep the learning internal.
Evidence before language
What the evidence supports comes first — the wording follows.
Limits before polish
Gaps and cautions stay visible rather than being smoothed over.
People decide, with the source trail visible
CIIS surfaces what the evidence allows; the decision stays with your team.
Use cases
Built for real reporting pressure.
Board reporting
Prepare updates that show supported statements and evidence limits.
Funder updates
Show what is backed, what is cautious, and what needs more evidence.
Grant acquittals
Connect statements to source evidence before submission.
Council programme reporting
Support clearer community and outcomes reporting.
Health & wellbeing outcomes
Keep person-centred outcomes reporting grounded in evidence.
Internal programme learning
Use gaps and limits to guide better evidence collection.
Evidence gap reviews
See what needs to change before stronger statements can be made.
What you get
Clearer reporting decisions, not just better-looking reports.
- Evidence-backed statements
- Reporting limits
- Cautious and held-back statements
- Evidence gap actions
- Source trail
- Safer report preparation
- Better internal learning
- Reduced overclaiming risk
- Clearer next evidence steps
The AI boundary
AI can assist. It does not decide.
CIIS is designed around governance first. AI may help organise or explain information only where safe, but it does not decide what can be claimed. Statement permission comes from assessed evidence and review rules.
AI can assist
Help organise and explain information — only where it is safe to do so.
People decide
What can be claimed comes from assessed evidence and review rules, not from AI.
Current status
Restricted pilot, not open SaaS.
CIIS is currently being developed through a restricted pilot pathway. The focus is comprehension, report truth, and surface discipline before wider release.
If your organisation needs clearer evidence-backed reporting and is willing to test the product carefully, we would like to talk.
Report what the evidence supports. See what still needs work.
Evidence surfaces. People decide. Limits stay visible.