Who it's for
Who IIL works with
Teams that must explain outcomes to boards, funders, or partners, and need to know what the evidence actually supports. CIIS is one tool IIL brings in when continuous evidence infrastructure is the right response.
IIL works best with teams that already need to explain outcomes across programs, funders, boards, or partners, and want a clearer way to connect evidence to the statements they make.
That can mean evaluation, evidence synthesis, measurement design, or reporting support. Where continuous evidence infrastructure is the right response, we bring in CIIS, with definitions, measures, and evidence made explicit rather than standardised away.
Audience fit
Who this practice is for
First wedge
Community organisations and NGOs
If your data is scattered across spreadsheets and stories, IIL can help you structure what you can say to boards and partners without overstating weak evidence. When that discipline needs to hold across reporting cycles, CIIS can keep the claims, sources, and limits in one place.
Example: A CIIS-supported test of one annual-report claim, for example participation or wellbeing wording, against survey exports and service records before publication.
Councils and local government
If you are accountable to committees or funders, IIL can help you show what the evidence can support, with limits visible before information is shared. CIIS is useful when those limits need to travel with the information every time it is reused.
Example: A place-based program or grant round where committee reporting must separate what the data supports from what is still assumption. A CIIS pilot is one way to keep that separation visible.
Primary Health Networks (PHNs) and program oversight teams
If you commission programs, IIL can help you compare progress and data quality across providers, with depth agreed for the engagement rather than promised generically. Where that comparison needs to stay current across a commissioning cycle, CIIS can support it.
Example: A hypothetical CIIS-supported comparison, not a shipped multi-organisation tenancy, might look at outcome statements across two or three commissioned providers, with evidence quality and shareability visible before aggregation.
Funders, philanthropies, and impact investors
If you oversee grants, IIL can help grantees report with shared definitions and honest evidence limits. CIIS can sit underneath that reporting where a shared evidence layer is useful; it is not a grant management system.
Example: Testing whether grantee reporting language is evidence-linked before it reaches portfolio review. That can be a CIIS pilot; it does not replace your grant operations system.
Evaluation and strategy teams
If you need sources inspectable alongside conclusions, IIL can support synthesis while your professional judgement stays central. CIIS is one way to keep those sources and limits attached when findings move to executive sign-off.
Example: When findings need to travel with sources attached, CIIS can structure a bounded set of outcome statements with inspectable evidence, especially before executive sign-off for external use.
Fit and boundaries
- Guided demos and pilots today, not self-serve general availability. See current status.
- Grant reporting outputs can be in scope; a full grant lifecycle CRM is not a launch feature.
- Roles and depth follow the live schema and pilot agreement (admin and standard user accounts today).
- Compliance languagestays oriented and implementation-specific, not blanket "certified" statements.
Often a weaker fit
- Single-lens reporting with no scrutiny on evidence support
- Real-time operational control rooms (not the core design centre)
- Very small programs with no multi-stakeholder reporting pressure
Discuss your evidence challenge
We'll work with you to see whether evaluation, synthesis, reporting support, or a CIIS pilot is the right next step — before you spend procurement time.
Discuss your evidence challenge