Skip to main content

Reporting lenses

Alignment layers, not proof

Reporting lenses help interpret evidence for different audiences. They do not prove impact, certify compliance, or replace review.

One record · many lensesNot proof

Record · one structured dataset

  1. SDGsGovernment outcomes

    01Government and international

  2. SROITBL

    02Funders and investors

  3. WellbeingDEIResilience

    03Community and place-based

  4. Theory of ChangeExecutive synthesis

    04Executive and programme

A lens changes how evidence is read for an audience. It does not prove impact, certify compliance or replace review.

Different audiences ask for different reporting shapes: a board summary, funder table, grant report, or international goals narrative. These eleven lenses are interpretation and reporting options. They are not all fully implemented current CIIS features. A lens is applied only where evidence and pilot scope support that reading.

What this is not

CIIS does not certify you against framework owners. Labels help structure interpretation; every statement still needs evidence, review, and clear limits. Your organisation remains responsible for meeting funder, regulator, legal, or framework-owner requirements.

Reporting lenses as interpretation options

SDGs lens in CIIS (Collaborative Impact Intelligence System)

SDGs

Sustainable Development Goals

SROI lens in CIIS (Collaborative Impact Intelligence System)

SROI

Social Return on Investment

TBL lens in CIIS (Collaborative Impact Intelligence System)

TBL

Triple Bottom Line

DEI lens in CIIS (Collaborative Impact Intelligence System)

DEI

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion

Wellbeing lens in CIIS (Collaborative Impact Intelligence System)

Wellbeing

Wellbeing Frameworks

Resilience lens in CIIS (Collaborative Impact Intelligence System)

Resilience

Resilience Indicators

Governance lens in CIIS (Collaborative Impact Intelligence System)

Governance

Governance Metrics

AARRR lens in CIIS (Collaborative Impact Intelligence System)

AARRR

AARRR Funnel Analysis

CEMP lens in CIIS (Collaborative Impact Intelligence System)

CEMP

Community Engagement & Media Platform

Theory of Change lens in CIIS (Collaborative Impact Intelligence System)

Theory of Change

Theory of Change

Executive synthesis lens in CIIS (Collaborative Impact Intelligence System)

Executive synthesis

Executive synthesis lens

Use the lens your audience needs

Government and international reporting

Why: When you need to align with national priorities or global goals your funders recognise.

Examples: Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), government outcome frameworks

Funders and investors

Why: When you must show value for money or social return in terms finance stakeholders understand.

Examples: Social Return on Investment (SROI), Triple Bottom Line (TBL), grant reporting

Community and place-based work

Why: When local wellbeing, equity, resilience, or governance quality is the heart of the story.

Examples: Wellbeing frameworks, diversity and inclusion (DEI), resilience indicators

Executive and programme overview

Why: When leaders need one readable summary without losing sight of evidence limits.

Examples: Theory of Change, programme funnels, executive synthesis lens

What CIIS helps you avoid

The same evidence re-keyed for different tables, or framework language that sounds impressive but drifts from what the data can support. Impact Intelligence Lab keeps that language tied to the evidence. A reporting lens is not proof or permission to publish.

The dated capability boundary is maintained on What CIIS does today page.

How it works in practice

  1. One structured dataset: what happened, who it affected, and what changed, with sources attached.
  2. Apply the right lens: map to the reporting shape your audience needs, where evidence and implementation support it.
  3. Keep the limit visible: record what the evidence does not support. That record is not permission to share.

Not sure which lens fits your context?

Bring the reporting pressure to a conversation. We will scope the evidence question and the appropriate reporting lens.

Discuss your evidence challenge